Entrepreneurship through (Cognitive) Emancipation: Implications for Research, Policy, and Practice in Contexts of Oppression
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Theoretical or conceptualConsensus signal: none
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.597
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.485
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
To help address the daunting reality of widespread human oppression, this paper offers a conceptual extension to a contemporary perspective on entrepreneurial activity that we suggest is of particular relevance for individuals living under oppressive conditions: emancipatory entrepreneurship theory. We extend this perspective by calling attention to the cognitive dynamics that precede the decision to engage in emancipation-motivated entrepreneurship within such environments, highlighting the specific importance of achieving cognitive liberation from the psychological state of learned helplessness that oppressed individuals often enact as a coping mechanism. We use the term “cognitive emancipation” to refer to this liberated state of mind, conceptualizing it as being characterized by mindfulness and an autonomous worldview. To help spur future research, we present and elaborate a process model delineating key cognitive factors that trigger—and are triggered by—this focal construct. We also offer various suggestions for the design and delivery of practical initiatives attentive to the importance of cognitive emancipation as a necessary psychological precursor to the pursuit of emancipation-motivated entrepreneurial endeavors within contexts of oppression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Academy of Management Perspectives
- Topic
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Field
- Business, Management and Accounting
- Canadian institutions
- University of LethbridgeUniversity of Alberta
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- OppressionEmancipationEntrepreneurshipSociologyCognitionPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical sciencePolitics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes