MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402218135 · doi:10.1136/jnis-2024-esmint.25

O25 eCLIPs implant in the endovascular treatment of wide neck aneurysms (WNBA)

2024· article· en· W4402218135 on OpenAlex
Leif Hovgaard Sørensen, Joost C. de Vries, Raphaël Blanc, Jeremy Rempel, Waleed Butt, Thomas R. Marotta

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEndovascular treatmentSurgeryAneurysm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> eCLIPs combines both coil retention and flow diversion by bridging the neck of WNBA. We describe eCLIPs implant experience to date using 2 delivery systems: i) via hypotube with requisite .034’ microcatheter, eBRS, and ii) via guidewire, compatible with smaller microcatheters, eB. <h3>Aim of Study</h3> We report the entire eCLIPs experience for safety and efficacy: 280 patients, 101 eBRS and 179 eB. <h3>Methods</h3> Procedural data were collected prospectively and follow up data were collected according to usual clinical practices. <h3>Results</h3> Implant procedural success rate was 88%, 82% for eBRS, 92% for eB. 35% of cases were recurrences, 20% prior rupture. Anatomy: 89% cases were basilar tip and carotid terminus locations. Mean followup 38 mo: Safety: Procedural neurologic death: 3% eBRS, 0% eB (overall 1.1%), CVA 3% eBRS, 1.1% eB (overall 1.8%), repeat procedure (all with inadequate neck-bridging) 2.5%. No patient had post-procedural thrombo-embolic or other neurologic safety events. Efficacy: Of 82 patients with eBRS implants, 61 meet eligibility criteria for a WEB-IT-patterned trial; all available 57 patients of this cohort had follow-up imaging, many with multiple imaging timepoints. Forty patients with eB implants have had follow-up &gt; 6 months. Modified Raymond Roy Occlusion Classification (for all patients) 1 = 80%, 2 = 16%. No patient had regression of mRROC score on serial follow-up imaging. <h3>Conclusion</h3> eCLIPs has a satisfactory safety profile; introduction of lower-profile eCLIPs delivery system, eliminating large microcatheters and complex sidebranch access, resulted in lower procedural complications and improved procedural success. Durable adequate occlusion is 96%. <h3>Disclosure of Interest</h3> yes Co-founder Evasc Neurovascular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it