Bibliographic record
Abstract
Margaret Mead shaped the field of childhood studies in anthropology in the early 20th century. One of her concerns was the challenge posed to the continuity of childcare from rapid social change in the 1940s and 1960s in the United States. Her interest in the contrast between slowly changing homogenous cultures and those undergoing rapid change developed into a one between independent and interdependent training of children. Yet, Mead was much more concerned with the social institutions that support continuity in enculturation than a binary contrast. Mead’s own expertise and her attention to the local expertise of women and mothers is juxtaposed with recent scholarly work on the production of expertise as a form of knowledge. Interest in local forms of women’s knowledge associated with ethnomethodology and feminist standpoint theory seems to have gone missing. Dramatic social change in Indonesia since the late 1990s has corresponded with a realignment of expertise in the era of democratic reform, highlighting the tension between local and globalized forms of knowledge around early childhood education and care (ECEC). Based on long-term ethnographic research in central Java, I argue that existing forms of governmentality offer the possibility for recognizing and redistributing the local expertise of neighborhood women and mothers as a balance to globalized programs for ECEC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".