MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402225550 · doi:10.1101/gad.352032.124

Heterozygous<i>RPA2</i>variant as a novel genetic cause of telomere biology disorders

2024· article· en· W4402225550 on OpenAlexaff
Rima Kochman, Ibrahima Ba, Maïlyn Yates, Vithura Pirabakaran, Florian Gourmelon, Dmitri Churikov, Maria A. Curotto de Lafaille, Laëtitia Kermasson, Coline Hamelin, Isabelle Marois, Frédéric Jourquin, Laura Braud, Marianne Bechara, Élodie Lainey, Hilario Nunès, Philippe Breton, Morgane Penhouet, Pierre David, Vincent Géli, Christophe Lachaud, Alexandre Maréchal, Patrick Revy, Caroline Kannengiesser, Carole Saintomé, Stéphane Coulon

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes & Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueLigue Contre le CancerAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsTelomereBiologyTelomere-binding proteinMutationMutantTelomeraseGeneGeneticsSomatic cellMolecular biologyDNA-binding proteinTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature telomere shortening or telomere instability is associated with a group of rare and heterogeneous diseases collectively known as telomere biology disorders (TBDs). Here we identified two unrelated individuals with clinical manifestations of TBDs and short telomeres associated with the identical monoallelic variant c.767A>G; Y256C inRPA2. Although the replication protein A2 (RPA2) mutant did not affect ssDNA binding and G-quadruplex-unfolding properties of RPA, the mutation reduced the affinity of RPA2 with the ubiquitin ligase RFWD3 and reduced RPA ubiquitination. Using engineered knock-in cell lines, we found an accumulation of RPA at telomeres that did not trigger ATR activation but caused short and dysfunctional telomeres. Finally, both patients acquired, in a subset of blood cells, somatic genetic rescue events in eitherPOT1genes orTERTpromoters known to counteract the accelerated telomere shortening. Collectively, our study indicates that variants inRPA2represent a novel genetic cause of TBDs. Our results further support the fundamental role of the RPA complex in regulating telomere length and stability in humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenes & DevelopmentSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207