MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402226288 · doi:10.3390/ma17174378

Theoretical Analysis of Stacking Fault Energy, Elastic Properties, Electronic Properties, and Work Function of MnxCoCrFeNi High-Entropy Alloy

2024· article· en· W4402226288 on OpenAlexaff
Fenger Sun, Guowei Zhang, Hong Xu, Dongyang Li, Yizheng Fu

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Entropy Alloys Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceStacking-fault energyHigh entropy alloysAlloySlip (aerodynamics)Density functional theoryCrystal twinningDislocationStacking faultWork (physics)Deformation (meteorology)Composite materialThermodynamicsMicrostructureComputational chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of different Mn concentrations on the generalized stacking fault energies (GSFE) and elastic properties of MnxCoCrFeNi high-entropy alloys (HEAs) have been studied via first-principles, which are based on density functional theory. The relationship of different Mn concentrations with the chemical bond and surface activity of MnxCoCrFeNi HEAs are discussed from the perspectives of electronic structure and work function. The results show that the plastic deformation of MnxCoCrFeNi HEAs can be controlled via dislocation-mediated slip. But with the increase in Mn concentration, mechanical micro twinning can still be formed. The deformation resistance, shear resistance, and stiffness of MnxCoCrFeNi HEAs increase with the enhancement of Mn content. Accordingly, in the case of increased Mn concentration, the weakening of atomic bonds in MnxCoCrFeNi HEAs leads to the increase in alloy instability, which improves the possibility of dislocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterialsSame topicHigh Entropy Alloys StudiesFrench-language works237,207