MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402229864 · doi:10.1080/08827508.2024.2395828

A Multi-Method Machine Learning Framework for Simulating Power Dynamics in an Iron Ore Cone Crusher Plant

2024· article· en· W4402229864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrusherCone (formal languages)Iron oreComputer sciencePower stationDynamics (music)Power (physics)Process engineeringMetallurgyMaterials scienceEngineeringAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Comminution, particularly post-crushing, is a critical phase in mineral processing that reduces run-of-mine ore to an acceptable particle size before undergoing a downstream beneficiation process. Despite its importance, this stage has been under-investigated probably due to challenges of sampling and data collection and inadequate technical and financial support. This research presents a multi-method machine learning framework designed to simulate the power dynamics within an industrial-scale iron ore cone crusher circuit. The framework integrates advanced artificial intelligence techniques to evaluate energy consumption and estimate cone crushers output K80 accurately. The developed framework spans from different algorithms by data preprocessing techniques such as normalization and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to standardize and reduce the dataset’s dimensionality, coupled with multiple machine learning algorithms, including Gradient Boosting Machines (CatBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. The study utilized real-time data collected over six months by considering the key operational parameters such as total tonnage, hopper filling levels, power draw, cone position, and crusher discharge settings. The modeling approach was assessed using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Asymmetric Loss (AL), and the coefficient of determination (R2) as performance metrics. Results indicated that the LSTM model outperformed other methods by achieving the lowest MAE and RMSE and the highest R2 score of 0.92, thereby demonstrating superior precision in estimation. However, XGBoost showed optimal performance in managing asymmetric loss, highlighting its efficiency in error management across different scenarios. Model residual analysis, performance metrics box plots, and scatter plots comparing measured and estimated data across the models are also provided for further analysis. This study demonstrates the transformative potential of machine learning models in refining industrial process simulations, ultimately driving enhanced productivity and sustainability in the mining industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it