Economic Empowerment of Women – A Study on Impact of SHGs in Tamil Nadu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[The SHGs are the really a boon to women empowerment, it is expected that the social and economic reforms leading to women development will be reality through self-help groups. Women’s contribution in the process of economic development of a country is very significant. In recent times, participation of women in the workforce has increased around the world. They have tremendous talent potential to contribute in harnessing technology for human and social development. The government and voluntary organizations are providing many income generating schemes to raise the economic status of women. Women’s empowerment is very essential for the development of the society. It would consist of greater access to knowledge and resources, greater autonomy in decision making, greater ability to plan their lives, better control over the circumstances that influence their lives and free from shackles imposed on them by custom, belief and practice. Their economic independence or economic empowerment occupies an area of greatest significance for a lasting and sustainable development of the society. Political participation and social up-liftment would be meaningless, if their economic independence is not achieved.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".