Case Report of Concomitant Diagnosis of Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Solitary Plasmacytoma of T11 Vertebra: Impact on Diagnostic and Clinical Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A solitary bone plasmacytoma is a rare tumor. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. We present the case of a 48-year-old female patient who consulted for recent back pain, with a final diagnosis of T10 solitary plasmacytoma and synchronous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Imaging suggested cholangiocarcinoma with bone metastasis. The patient underwent neurosurgical management with laminectomy, arthrodesis, and arthrectomy, with biopsies revealing monotypic kappa plasmacytic proliferation. Liver biopsies revealed an adenocarcinoma with expression of cytokeratin 19, cytokeratin 7, N-cadherin, and high expression of carbonic anydrase IX. The plasmacytoma was treated with external radiotherapy. The cholangiocarcinoma was treated with selective internal radiation therapy and concomitant systemic treatment with combinations of cisplatin and durvalumab, with capecitabine during radiotherapy, switched for gemcitabine after completion of irradiation. One year after initial management, imaging revealed a partial metabolic response of the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and a complete metabolic response of the plasmacytoma. This case illustrates the importance of not ignoring two primary tumors and the management of two concomitant treatments exploiting potential therapeutic synergies and limiting expected toxicities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".