MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402241159 · doi:10.55981/baca.2023.1129

Analisis Logika Dokumentasi Blasius Sudarsono dari Perspektif Komunikasi

2023· article· en· W4402241159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBACA JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Christian Leadership and Education
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The development of documentation science in the global world is currently growing rapidly. This development emphasizes the materiality aspect of documents that are not only written and printed, but anything can be a document. Document Academy (DOCAM) is a group that develops documentation science from various perspectives. The aim of this research is to analyze Blasius Sudarsono's documentation logic ideas from a communication perspective. The method used is a qualitative research with a literature study approach.The results of this research shows that documentation and communication cannot be separated from each other. Communication in documentation logic is called an expression where documentation is the result of the expression. In social theory, communication can be seen as a human social system. Meanwhile, in document complementarity theory, communication is also seen as a social phenomenon.The conclusion of this research is that the communication concept used in Blasius Sudarsono's documentation logic lies in the keyword express. The response to the expression is documentation. Approaching documentation from a communication perspective means approaching it from a social aspect. The form of documentation is not only focused on its materiality but its social function. ABSTRAK Perkembangan ilmu dokumentasi di dunia global saat ini berkembang sangat pesat. Perkembangan ini menekankan pada aspek materialitas dari dokumen yang tidak hanya tertulis dan tercetak, tetapi apapun dapat menjadi dokumen. Document Academy (DOCAM) menjadi kelompok yang mengembangkan ilmu dokumentasi dari berbagai perspektif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis gagasan logika dokumentasi Blasius Sudarsono dari perspektif komunikasi. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi literatur. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dokumentasi dan komunikasi tidak dapat dipisahkan satu sama lain. Komunikasi dalam logika dokumentasi disebut ekspresi dan dokumentasi merupakan hasil dari ekspresi tersebut. Secara teori sosial, komunikasi dapat dilihat sebagai sistem sosial dari manusia. Sementara itu, dalam teori komplementaritas dokumen, komunikasi dilihat sebagai fenomena sosial. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah konsep komunikasi yang digunakan dalam logika dokumentasi Blasius Sudarsono terletak pada kata kunci mengekspresikan. Respon dari ekpresi disebut dengan dokumentasi. Pendekatan dokumentasi dari perspektif komunikasi berarti melakukan pendekatan dari aspek sosial. Bentuk pendokumentasian tidak hanya terfokus pada materialitasnya saja, tetapi juga fungsinya secara sosial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it