MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402242909 · doi:10.1177/00207020241276099

Lessons from the Frontline: The Burgeoning Security and Economic Race in the Indo-Pacific

2024· article· en· W4402242909 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yves Tiberghien

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDefense, Military, and Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaRivalryInternational tradeForeign direct investmentInternational securityDevelopment economicsNational securityBusinessPolitical scienceEconomicsEconomic growthPolitical economyPublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Democracies in the Indo-Pacific are facing an increasingly competitive and securitized environment, as China turns more assertive and the US-China rivalry escalates. Disruptions include uncertainty about the global economic order, technological decoupling, an arms race amidst intense hot spots, an economic security spiral, and larger systemic risks around climate change, AI governance, etc. Countries such as Japan and Korea are actively responding to these risks through a strategic approach to economic security and increased defense spending, active alliance development, and parallel continued investment in global institutions and dialogue. Canada must be jolted out of its-business-as-usual approach and take a cue from its closest partners in Asia. This includes investing rapidly in its security (2% of defense over GDP) and the creation of an economic security council under the Prime Minister. Canada should also join its key partners in effectively investing in key global institutions in times of crisis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicDefense, Military, and Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207