MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402248387 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v14n6p610

Examining the Consequences and Influence of Post-Colonialism in Amitav Ghosh's The Glass Palace

2024· article· en· W4402248387 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R Amalan, Krishna Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPeriyar University
KeywordsColonialismHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Glass Palace (2000) by Amitav Ghosh is a chronicled novel that shows how Burma was colonised and affected the rich and the poor. Post-colonial literature is a group of works of art that deal with the problems and effects of Europe's colonisation of the Middle East, Asia, and Africa. Beginning with the British attack on Burma in 1885 and ending with the Second World War, Ghosh covers a vast amount of South Asian history and imperialism. This paper focuses on studying some historical events that have been kept quiet and telling their stories along with those of ordinary people and repressed subalterns. Raj Kumar, the novel's main character, tells the powerful stories of exile and displacement of people who were split up after a radical event and now live in different parts of Asia. The natives are shown as victims instead of enemies of the colonisers. Further, the article tells the ugly truth about colonialism and its effects through the eyes of three generations living in the three regions of the British Empire that were all connected: Burma, Malaya, and India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.019
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicSouth Asian Studies and DiasporaFrench-language works237,207