MRDPDA: A multi‐Laplacian regularized deepFM model for predicting piRNA‐disease associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are a typical class of small non-coding RNAs, which are essential for gene regulation, genome stability and so on. Accumulating studies have revealed that piRNAs have significant potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for a variety of diseases. However current computational methods face the challenge in effectively capturing piRNA-disease associations (PDAs) from limited data. In this study, we propose a novel method, MRDPDA, for predicting PDAs based on limited data from multiple sources. Specifically, MRDPDA integrates a deep factorization machine (deepFM) model with regularizations derived from multiple yet limited datasets, utilizing separate Laplacians instead of a simple average similarity network. Moreover, a unified objective function to combine embedding loss about similarities is proposed to ensure that the embedding is suitable for the prediction task. In addition, a balanced benchmark dataset based on piRPheno is constructed and a deep autoencoder is applied for creating reliable negative set from the unlabeled dataset. Compared with three latest methods, MRDPDA achieves the best performance on the pirpheno dataset in terms of the five-fold cross validation test and independent test set, and case studies further demonstrate the effectiveness of MRDPDA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".