GGTyper: genotyping complex structural variants using short-read sequencing data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Complex structural variants (SVs) are genomic rearrangements that involve multiple segments of DNA. They contribute to human diversity and have been shown to cause Mendelian disease. Nevertheless, our abilities to analyse complex SVs are very limited. As opposed to deletions and other canonical types of SVs, there are no established tools that have explicitly been designed for analysing complex SVs. RESULTS: Here, we describe a new computational approach that we specifically designed for genotyping complex SVs in short-read sequenced genomes. Given a variant description, our approach computes genotype-specific probability distributions for observing aligned read pairs with a wide range of properties. Subsequently, these distributions can be used to efficiently determine the most likely genotype for any set of aligned read pairs observed in a sequenced genome. In addition, we use these distributions to compute a genotyping difficulty for a given variant, which predicts the amount of data needed to achieve a reliable call. Careful evaluation confirms that our approach outperforms other genotypers by making reliable genotype predictions across both simulated and real data. On up to 7829 human genomes, we achieve high concordance with population-genetic assumptions and expected inheritance patterns. On simulated data, we show that precision correlates well with our prediction of genotyping difficulty. This together with low memory and time requirements makes our approach well-suited for application in biomedical studies involving small to very large numbers of short-read sequenced genomes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is available at https://github.com/kehrlab/Complex-SV-Genotyping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".