One-carbon metabolites supplementation and nutrient restriction alter the fetal liver metabolomic profile during early gestation in beef heifers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maternal nutrition is pivotal for proper fetal development, with one-carbon metabolites (OCM) playing a key role in fetal epigenetic programming through DNA and histone methylation. The study aimed to investigate the effects of nutrient restriction and OCM supplementation on fetal liver metabolomics in pregnant beef-heifers, focusing on metabolites and pathways associated with amino acid, vitamin and cofactor, carbohydrate, and energy metabolism at day 63 of gestation. Thirty-one crossbred Angus heifers were artificially inseminated and allocated to 4 nutritional treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments, with the 2 factors being dietary intake/rate of gain (control-diet [CON]; 0.60 kg/d ADG, vs. restricted-diet [RES]; -0.23 kg/d ADG) and OCM supplementation (supplemented [+OCM] vs. not supplemented [-OCM]). The resulting treatment groups-CON - OCM, CON + OCM, RES - OCM, and RES + OCM were maintained for 63 day post-breeding. Following this period, fetal liver tissues were collected and subjected to metabolomic analysis using UPLC-tandem mass-spectrometry. We identified 288 metabolites, with the majority (n = 54) being significantly influenced by the main effect of gain (P ≤ 0.05). Moreover, RES showed decreased abundances of most metabolites in pathways such as lysine metabolism; leucine, isoleucine, and valine metabolism; and tryptophan metabolism, compared to CON. Supplementation with OCM vs. no OCM supplementation, resulted in greater abundance of metabolites (P ≤ 0.05) affecting pathways associated with methionine, cysteine, S-adenosylmethionine and taurine metabolism; guanidino and acetamido metabolism; and nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism. Notably, OCM supplementation with a moderate rate of gain increased the concentrations of ophthalmate, N-acetylglucosamine, and ascorbic-acid 3-sulfate, which are important for proper fetal development (P ≤ 0.05). Nutrient restriction reduced the majority of liver metabolites, while OCM supplementation increased a smaller number of metabolites. Thus, OCM supplementation may be protective of metabolite concentrations in key developmental pathways, which could potentially enhance fetal development under nutrient-restricted conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".