MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402255331 · doi:10.32920/26950432

On-Demand Public Transit Systems: Demand Analysis, Network Modelling, and Sustainability Evaluation

2024· preprint· en· W4402255331 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nael Alsaleh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityPublic transportTransit (satellite)Transit systemEnvironmental economicsDemand managementBusinessOn demandTransport engineeringComputer scienceEconomicsEngineeringCommerce

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, with the rapid advancements in information and communication technology, several on-demand public transit (ODT) systems have emerged as innovative solutions for low-density areas. The dissertation explores the network designs, develops demand models, and analyzes the sustainability of ODTs. In particular, the dissertation considers the following key research questions: 1) What are the spatio-temporal patterns of demand for ODT? 2) What are the main factors affecting the demand for ODT? 3) What are the main factors affecting user preference between fixed-route transit (FRT) and ODT? 4) How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect the demand for ODT? Do the impacts vary between small and large urban areas? 5) When and where is each ODT network design most efficient and sustainable? To address these research questions, this dissertation utilizes actual ODT operational data from the City of Belleville and the Town of Innisfil, Ontario. The dissertation is based on five articles introduced in Chapters 3 to 7. Chapter 3 provides an in-depth analysis of the spatio-temporal demand and supply, level of service, and origin-destination patterns of dedicated fleet ODT services, based on data collected from Belleville. Chapter 4 introduces data-driven models for trip production and distribution for dedicated fleet ODTs using data collected from Belleville. In Chapter 5, hybrid choice models are developed to explain the service preference of ODT users among the FRT and ODT services. The models are estimated using a rich dataset that combines the actual level of service attributes obtained from Belleville’s ODT service and self-reported usage behavior obtained from a revealed preference survey of the ODT users. Chapter 6 presents an in-depth analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for crowdsourced ODTs using data from Innisfil, Ontario, and a detailed comparison with the City of Chicago, Illinois. Chapter 7 provides a micro-simulation model calibrated on the crowdsourced ODT data from Innisfil, Ontario, to evaluate the sustainability of several ODT designs. The analyses and the models developed in this dissertation will assist transit agencies in delivering more convenient, attractive, cost-efficient, and sustainable ODT services in low-density settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207