MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402258658 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3449036

Scalable Spatial and Geometric Learning Approach for Joint Power Control and Channel Allocation

2024· article· en· W4402258658 on OpenAlexaff
Maher Marwani, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityPower controlJoint (building)Channel (broadcasting)Channel allocation schemesControl (management)Power (physics)WirelessArtificial intelligenceComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research paper introduces an unsupervised scalable probabilistic approach for radio resource management in device-to-device (D2D) communication networks, essential for enhancing wireless data service capacity. We propose a joint optimization framework for spectrum allocation and power control, aiming to optimize the network’s mean rate while meeting minimum data rate requirements. Although deep learning (DL) models have been explored for this purpose, their scalability is constrained by the fixed sizes of their input/output features, and their effectiveness is often limited by an insufficient understanding of the network’s geometric structure. Consequently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) were introduced to integrate the wireless network’s topology into the learning process. However, GNNs typically lose spatial correlation data when converting the tensorized channel state information (CSI) into a graph structure. To overcome this limitation, our solution combines GNNs, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and variational autoencoders to extract meaningful embeddings from the CSI, preserving spatial and geometric features. We also introduce an innovative graph attention mechanism that enhances the model’s focus on crucial node and edge features. Our holistic approach exploits the wireless network’s topological and spatial relationships, offering a scalable, unsupervised, and generalizable solution without the need for retraining or architectural adjustments across various wireless setups. Our findings confirm our method’s superior performance and adaptability to different wireless environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207