MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402260071 · doi:10.62973/12-155

OGC OWS-9 OWS Innovations WCS for LIDAR Engineering Report

2013· report· en· W4402260071 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Systems and Laser Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefence Science and Technology GroupNatural Resources CanadaU.S. Army Corps of EngineersDefence Science and Technology LaboratoryNational Geospatial-Intelligence AgencyFederal Aviation AdministrationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsLidarGeographyCartographyRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Engineering Report is prepared as a deliverable for the OGC Web Services, Phase 9 (OWS-9) initiatitive of the Innovations Coverages Sub-Thread.This document represents the OWS-9 OWS Innovations WCS for LIDAR Engineering Report.In this report, the implementation of WCS 2.0 service that serves the LIDAR data in NITF format is introduced.This service supports the JPEG 2000 output format along with GMLJP2 metadata description as well as the JPIP protocol to deliver the output JPEG2000 data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.399

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1190.135

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Systems and Laser TechnologyFrench-language works237,207