MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Casdenet: Cascade Automatic Road Detection Network Based on Dynamic Snake Convolution and Edge Branch

2024· article· en· W4402260689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wanwan Yu, Baorong Xie, Dongyang Liu, Caiting Fang, Junping Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutomated Road and Building Extraction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCascadeComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionArtificial intelligenceEngineeringArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated road detection from the high-resolution remote sensing images (RSI) is always a hot topic. Particularly, the accurate and continuous road detection in RSI is challenging due to the tree and shadow shading and unsmooth road edges further hindering the accuracy of the road extraction. Considering that the dynamic snake convolution (DSConv) is able to capture the distinctive characteristics of tubular objects such as roads, and edge information extracted from road edge branch can enhance the smoothness of road edges, we propose a cascade automatic road detection method based on DSConv and edge branch named CasDeNet. Specifically, the DSConv is introduced as the foundational module for low-level feature extraction of CasDeNet, aiming to capture the intricate shapes of roads. Road edge information from the edge branch is incorporated to ensure the smoothness of the road edges. Experiments are conducted on the Ottawa dataset. The results show that the proposed CasDeNet can extract more coherent and accurate roads compared to other state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods and achieve the best results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAutomated Road and Building ExtractionFrench-language works237,207