MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fractional-Order Integral Neural-Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Input-Affine Systems

2024· article· en· W4402261808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemAffine transformationControl theory (sociology)Adaptive controlComputer scienceOrder (exchange)MathematicsArtificial neural networkApplied mathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Long decaying memory is a trademark of fractional calculus operations. These can be incorporated in the feedback and training laws of neural-adaptive controllers; the adaptive laws for feedforward and transform matrix artificial neural networks (ANNs) inherit historical errors. Thus, requiring an analysis of such a scheme on different control problems over prolonged executions; this enables the ability to observe the interactions between ANNs (feedforward and transform matrices) and fractional-order integral (FOI), as both are adaptive memory functions. Moreover, Lyapunov stability methods paved the way to incorporate FOI in feedback and adaptive laws for nonlinear input-affine dynamical systems. A planar 2-degree-of-freedom serial manipulator executes two control problems: task-space trajectory tracking and hybrid force-position control, in separate simulations. The proposed FOI-based method provides significantly better results than a non-FOI baseline method while remaining stable over prolonged cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems DesignFrench-language works237,207