Privacy-Preserving Autoencoder for Collaborative Object Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Privacy is a crucial concern in collaborative machine vision where a part of a Deep Neural Network (DNN) model runs on the edge, and the rest is executed on the cloud. In such applications, the machine vision model does not need the exact visual content to perform its task. Taking advantage of this potential, private information could be removed from the data insofar as it does not significantly impair the accuracy of the machine vision system. In this paper, we present an autoencoder-style network integrated within an object detection pipeline, which generates a latent representation of the input image that preserves task-relevant information while removing private information. Our approach employs an adversarial training strategy that not only removes private information from the bottleneck of the autoencoder but also promotes improved compression efficiency for feature channels coded by conventional codecs like VVC-Intra. We assess the proposed system using a realistic evaluation framework for privacy, directly measuring face and license plate recognition accuracy. Experimental results show that our proposed method is able to reduce the bitrate significantly at the same object detection accuracy compared to coding the input images directly, while keeping the face and license plate recognition accuracy on the images recovered from the bottleneck features low, implying strong privacy protection. Our code is available at https://github.com/bardia-az/ppa-code.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".