MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402262546 · doi:10.62973/12-156

OWS-9 Reference Architecture Profile (RAP) Advisor Engineering Report

2013· report· en· W4402262546 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Test Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefence Science and Technology GroupNatural Resources CanadaU.S. Army Corps of EngineersDefence Science and Technology LaboratoryNational Geospatial-Intelligence AgencyFederal Aviation AdministrationU.S. Geological SurveyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsArchitectureComputer architectureEngineeringComputer scienceGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Reference Architecture Profiler (RAP) Advisor is a web based application that recommends OGC Standards and OGC Reference Model (ORM) Sections that are relevant to a system development; such that a community of interest could derive and build a profile of suitable OGC standards to meet their specific needs.This Engineering Report contains the requirements, conceptual design, development methodology, and implementation of the RAP Advisor.Initial development of the RAP Advisor was concurrent with the OGC Web Services Testbed, Phase 9 (OWS-9) with NGA sponsorship.During OWS-9 timeframe, key concepts of the RAP Advisor were confirmed through prototyping.Future development is required to complete the functions and content of the Advisor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.037

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering and Test SystemsFrench-language works237,207