MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402263877 · doi:10.1109/sp54263.2024.00166

Eureka: A General Framework for Black-box Differential Privacy Estimators

2024· article· en· W4402263877 on OpenAlexaff
Yun Lu, Malik Magdon‐Ismail, Yu Wei, Vassilis Zikas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferential privacyBlack boxComputer scienceEstimatorDifferential (mechanical device)StatisticsData miningMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Differential privacy (DP) is a key tool in privacy-preserving data analysis. Yet it remains challenging for non-privacy-experts to prove the DP of their algorithms. We propose a methodology for domain experts with limited data privacy background to empirically estimate the privacy of an arbitrary mechanism. Our Eureka moment is a new link— which we prove—between the problems of DP parameter-estimation and Bayes optimal classifiers in ML, which we believe can be of independent interest. Our estimator uses this link to achieve two desirable properties: (1) black-box, i.e., it does not require knowledge of the underlying mechanism, and (2) it has a theoretically-proven accuracy, depending on the underlying classifier used, allowing plug-and-play use of different classifiers.More concretely, motivated by the impossibility of the above task for unrestricted input domains (which we prove), we introduce a natural, application-inspired relaxation of DP which we term relative DP. Intuitively, relative DP defines a mechanism's privacy relative to an input set$\mathcal{T}$, circumventing the above impossibility when $\mathcal{T}$ is finite. Importantly, it preserves the key intuitive privacy guarantee of DP while enjoying a number of desirable DP properties—scalability, composition, and robustness to post-processing. We then devise a black-box poly-time (ε, δ)-relative DP estimator for any poly-size $\mathcal{T}$— the first privacy estimator to support mechanisms with large output spaces while having tight accuracy bounds. As a result of independent interest, we generalize our theory to develop the first Distributional Differential Privacy (DDP) estimator.We benchmark our estimator in a proof-of-concept implementation. First, using kNN as the classifier we show that our method (1) produces a tight, analytically computed (ε,δ)-DP trade-off of low-dimensional Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms—the first to do so, (2) accurately estimates the privacy spectrum of DDP mechanisms, and (3) can verify a DP mechanism's implementations, e.g., Sparse Vector Technique, Noisy Histogram, and Noisy max. Our implementation and experiments demonstrate the potential of our framework, and highlight its computational bottlenecks in estimating DP, e.g., in terms of the size of δ and the data dimensionality. Our second, neural-network-based instantiation makes a first step in showing that our method can be extended to mechanisms with high-dimensional outputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0080.010
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207