MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synchronization Error Elimination for Heterogeneous Discrete-Time Multi-Agent Systems: A Reinforcement Learning Design Approach

2024· article· en· W4402264024 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceSynchronization (alternating current)Multi-agent systemDiscrete time and continuous timeDistributed computingControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)MathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel reinforcement learning approach to solve the optimal output synchronization problem for discrete-time heterogeneous multi-agent systems. Different from existing learning methods, the optimal control protocol is obtained to guarantee zero synchronization error by solving the augmented algebraic Riccati equations (AREs). The proposed adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) method can stabilize the output synchronization error and solve the output regulator equations implicitly. To eliminate the dependency on information of system dynamics, an online Q-function-based policy iteration (PI) algorithm is developed. Finally, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed ADP over traditional ADP in terms of synchronization performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlFrench-language works237,207