MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Detection of Small Objects from UAV Imagery via an Improved Swin Transformer

2024· article· en· W4402264124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTransformerAerial imageryEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automated detection of small objects such as vehicles in images of complex urban environments taken by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is one of the most challenging tasks in computer vision and remote sensing communities. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)-based deep learning models have been widely used to automatically detect objects in UAV images given their high performance. However, their detection accuracy is still unsatisfactory, particularly when it comes to small objects, due to the shortcomings of CNNs. Therefore, in this study, we propose a Swin Transformer-based model that incorporates convolutions with the Swin Transformer to extract more local information, mitigating the problem of small object detection from complex backgrounds in UAV images and further improving the detection accuracy. By using the Swin Transformer, our model leverages both the local feature extraction of convolutions and the global feature modeling of transformers. The framework comprises two primary modules: a Local Context Enhancement (LCE) module and a Residual U-Feature Pyramid Network (RSU-FPN) module. Additionally, it incorporates a loss function that combines L1 loss with Normalized Gaussian Wasserstein Distance. Our experimental results obtained on the UAV Detection and Tracking (UAVDT) dataset indicated that our proposed method increased the average precision (AP) by 21.6%, 22.3% and 25.5% over Cascade Region-based CNN (R-CNN), Faster Region based CNN (R-CNN) with ResNet-50 and with Pyramid Vision Transformer (PVT) B0, and Dynamic R-CNN detectors, respectively, indicating its effectiveness and reliability on small object detection from UAV images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207