Multi-Layered Ontology Models for Dynamic Knowledge Representation in Social Network Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of social networks, understanding the multifaceted nature of human interactions and the dissemination of information is pivotal. This paper introduces a novel approach to dynamic knowledge representation through the development of Multi-Layered Ontology Models tailored for Social Network Analysis (SNA). The core of this research lies in architecting a robust, scalable, and semantically rich framework that leverages the principles of data mining and web technologies to dissect and interpret the complex structure of social networks. The ontology layers are intricately designed to represent various dimensions of social interactions, including temporal dynamics, user behavior, and network evolution. Each layer is interlinked yet distinct, providing a granular view of the social fabric and enabling precise inference and prediction of patterns. The methodology adopts an innovative blend of semantic web technologies for ontology construction, coupled with advanced data mining techniques to efficiently process and analyze large volumes of social data. The result is a dynamic model that adapts to the ever-changing social context, offering valuable insights into trends, community structures, and influence dissemination. The implications of this research are vast, impacting areas ranging from targeted marketing to public opinion analysis. This paper sets a new precedent for interdisciplinary research in SNA, opening avenues for further exploration and refinement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".