Designing a Resilient Microgrid for Disaster-Prone Areas Using Renewable Energy Sources
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research explores the development of a resilient microgrid architecture specifically tailored for disaster-prone areas, with a primary focus on the integration of renewable energy sources. The escalating frequency of natural disasters, compounded by the vulnerabilities of traditional power systems, underscores the imperative for more resilient and sustainable energy solutions. This study presents a comprehensive design methodology that encompasses the use of solar photovoltaics (PV), wind turbines, and battery storage systems, aiming to enhance the microgrid's reliability, sustainability, and adaptability in the face of catastrophic events. Through rigorous simulation and optimization techniques, the proposed design is evaluated against a set of resilience metrics, including the microgrid's ability to maintain critical loads operational during and after disaster scenarios, its recovery time, and its overall environmental impact. The findings indicate that the integration of renewable energy sources, coupled with advanced control strategies, significantly improves the microgrid's robustness and self-sufficiency, thereby reducing reliance on external power supplies and minimizing recovery times. Additionally, the environmental analysis reveals a substantial reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, aligning with global sustainability goals. This study contributes to the burgeoning field of resilient energy systems by providing a viable framework for the deployment of renewable energy-powered microgrids in regions susceptible to natural disasters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".