MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fractional-Order Integral Neural-Adaptive Update and Feedback Laws

2024· article· en· W4402265084 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Order (exchange)Artificial neural networkFractional calculusLawApplied mathematicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Political science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neural-adaptive controller with fractional-order integral (FOI) feedback and update laws is developed to enhance tracking performance and response to uncertainties. Feedback control law with an FOIs react quickly to uncer-tainties, such as biases, which complement slow-responding artificial neural networks (ANN). Adaptive ANNs are further enhanced by including FOI in network training, improving convergence speed and depth. Lyapunov stability methods enabled the creation of the proposed method generalized on a nonlinear direct-input system. Simulated quad copter and serial manipulator systems utilize the proposed method to follow trajectories in their respective spaces. The proposed controller significantly enhances performance and adaptive capabilities while remaining stable over multiple execution cycles relative to baseline non-FOI adaptive methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Control Systems DesignFrench-language works237,207