Application of Blockchain Technology in Ontology Management for Enhanced Data Security in Web Platforms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blockchain technology presents a transformative approach to ensuring data integrity, security, and trust in web platforms. This research explores the innovative application of blockchain as an underlying layer in ontology management systems to revolutionize data security and privacy. Ontologies, as structured frameworks for organizing information, are pivotal in enhancing understanding and interoperability among diverse web technologies. Integrating blockchain with ontology management involves creating immutable and verifiable records of ontological changes, access, and transactions. This ensures a transparent and secure mechanism for handling data, addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in centralized and less secure data management systems. The paper delves into architectural design, outlining how blockchain's decentralized nature and cryptographic algorithms contribute to robust ontology management. It presents a comparative analysis of existing data security mechanisms and illustrates the superior safeguards afforded by the blockchain-ontology model. Furthermore, the research highlights case studies from web platforms that have integrated this model, demonstrating notable improvements in data security, trust, and efficiency. The implications of this integration extend beyond enhanced security; they include improved data provenance, quality, and a reduction in fraudulent activities. This paper aims to catalyze further innovation and adoption of blockchain in web technologies, particularly in ontology management, to create a more secure and trustworthy digital ecosystem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".