Transnational pathways of financial interdependence: <i>testimonios</i> from young transgender women Venezuelan migrants in Latin America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Achieving financial independence from parents holds importance in the transition to adulthood, particularly in high-income countries. However, this process becomes complex for young LGBTQ+ people and those from low- and middle-income nations, especially in cases of cross-border migration. This study presents qualitative insights drawn from testimonio interviews with 17 Venezuelan transgender women, aged 19–29, who migrated to Peru. Employing a thematic analysis, we explored four key themes: (1) motivations for leaving Venezuela, (2) financial support to migrate, (3) employment challenges in host countries, and (4) family remittance. Our focus centers on the participants’ challenges in achieving financial independence throughout their migration journey. Commencing migration from vulnerable economic positions, participants often received initial familial economic support. However, once established in Peru, they faced a paradox of sending remittances back to Venezuela to support their family even amidst personal economic difficulties in the host country. These findings reveal the complex financial interdependencies and vulnerabilities that mark the experiences of young Venezuelan transgender women migrants, contrasting sharply with the experiences of young transgender people in high-income nations. The findings challenge typical portrayals of young transgender individuals by illuminating the often overlooked role of Venezuelan transgender women migrants as familial providers, redefining financial independence in the context of global inequities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".