Abstract B023: Multicenter histology image integration and multiscale deep learning for pediatric sarcoma subtype classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Pediatric sarcomas are rare and diverse, with few highly specialized centers reviewing sufficient volume to hone histopathological expertise, resulting in frequent misclassification. Digitization of histology slides enables automated imaging analysis and training of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for sarcoma subtype classification. Such tools are reproducible, mitigate against inter-observer bias, and can be implemented at a distance, allowing for global access to more precise diagnostics. A limitation is insufficient high-quality data to train models and avoid overfitting. Here, we amass a digitized sarcoma histology dataset from multiple centers. We designed a computational pipeline to (1) harmonize images to remove center-specific artifacts, (2) mirror a traditional pathologist’s process by extracting imaging features at varying sizes and magnifications, and (3) implement the latest in deep learning backbones to perform automated classification of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) v. non-rhabdomyosarcoma (NRSTS) and further subtyping. We provide powerful proof of concept for the ability of these techniques to expand access to highly specialized care to the global pediatric sarcoma population. Methods: Hematoxylin & Eosin-stained images and limited clinical data were collected with representation from numerous centers. We optimized a pipeline for focus checking, resolution standardization, stain normalization, and image format conversion to generate a harmonized dataset of over 500 images. We tested varying tile sizes and overlaps, magnification powers, and single- vs. multi-scale concatenated-feature sets to optimize classification accuracy. Deep learning feature extraction was performed with two backbones (InceptionV3 and CTranspath). Using our previously developed SAMPLER method, we create statistical representations of each feature to train and test ANN classifiers for RMS vs NRSTS and further subtype predictions. Results: Optimal parameters were 224 pixel tile size and 112 micron spacing on center, yielding non-overlapping tiles when viewed at 20X, 0.5 microns per pixel (mpp). Single scale feature extraction at 0.5 and 1.0 outperformed 0.75 mpp. Multi-scale feature concatenation from the combination of 0.5 and 1.0 mpp provided the best overall classification performance. In matched analyses of all tested parameter combinations, CTranspath outperformed InceptionV3 with consistently higher area under curve. Conclusions: Our multi-institutional pediatric sarcoma histology dataset represents the broadest harmonized resource of this type to our knowledge. Using a multiscale approach and optimized tiling parameters, we demonstrate the superiority of vision transformer- over strict convolutional ANNs to provide gross distinction between sarcoma subtypes. Our harmonization procedures open the door for expansion of the dataset through ongoing multi-institutional collaboration, bringing promise for a future in which automated image review may accurately and remotely identify sarcoma histology, improving subtype-specific delivery of care. Citation Format: Adam H. Thiesen, Sergii Domanskyi, Ali Foroughi pour, Todd B. Sheridan, Steven B. Neuhauser, Alyssa Stetson, Katelyn Dannheim, Danielle B. Cameron, Shawn Ahn, Hao Wu, Emily R. Christison-Lagay, Carol J. Bult, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Jill C. Rubinstein. Multicenter histology image integration and multiscale deep learning for pediatric sarcoma subtype classification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B023.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".