MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B023: Multicenter histology image integration and multiscale deep learning for pediatric sarcoma subtype classification

2024· article· en· W4402266297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adam H. Thiesen, Sergii Domanskyi, Ali Foroughi pour, Todd Sheridan, Steven B. Neuhauser, Alyssa Stetson, Katelyn Dannheim, Danielle B. Cameron, Shawn S. Ahn, Hao Wu, Emily Christison‐Lagay, Carol J. Bult, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Jill C. Rubinstein

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistologyMedicineSarcomaPathologyArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Pediatric sarcomas are rare and diverse, with few highly specialized centers reviewing sufficient volume to hone histopathological expertise, resulting in frequent misclassification. Digitization of histology slides enables automated imaging analysis and training of artificial neural networks (ANNs) for sarcoma subtype classification. Such tools are reproducible, mitigate against inter-observer bias, and can be implemented at a distance, allowing for global access to more precise diagnostics. A limitation is insufficient high-quality data to train models and avoid overfitting. Here, we amass a digitized sarcoma histology dataset from multiple centers. We designed a computational pipeline to (1) harmonize images to remove center-specific artifacts, (2) mirror a traditional pathologist’s process by extracting imaging features at varying sizes and magnifications, and (3) implement the latest in deep learning backbones to perform automated classification of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) v. non-rhabdomyosarcoma (NRSTS) and further subtyping. We provide powerful proof of concept for the ability of these techniques to expand access to highly specialized care to the global pediatric sarcoma population. Methods: Hematoxylin & Eosin-stained images and limited clinical data were collected with representation from numerous centers. We optimized a pipeline for focus checking, resolution standardization, stain normalization, and image format conversion to generate a harmonized dataset of over 500 images. We tested varying tile sizes and overlaps, magnification powers, and single- vs. multi-scale concatenated-feature sets to optimize classification accuracy. Deep learning feature extraction was performed with two backbones (InceptionV3 and CTranspath). Using our previously developed SAMPLER method, we create statistical representations of each feature to train and test ANN classifiers for RMS vs NRSTS and further subtype predictions. Results: Optimal parameters were 224 pixel tile size and 112 micron spacing on center, yielding non-overlapping tiles when viewed at 20X, 0.5 microns per pixel (mpp). Single scale feature extraction at 0.5 and 1.0 outperformed 0.75 mpp. Multi-scale feature concatenation from the combination of 0.5 and 1.0 mpp provided the best overall classification performance. In matched analyses of all tested parameter combinations, CTranspath outperformed InceptionV3 with consistently higher area under curve. Conclusions: Our multi-institutional pediatric sarcoma histology dataset represents the broadest harmonized resource of this type to our knowledge. Using a multiscale approach and optimized tiling parameters, we demonstrate the superiority of vision transformer- over strict convolutional ANNs to provide gross distinction between sarcoma subtypes. Our harmonization procedures open the door for expansion of the dataset through ongoing multi-institutional collaboration, bringing promise for a future in which automated image review may accurately and remotely identify sarcoma histology, improving subtype-specific delivery of care. Citation Format: Adam H. Thiesen, Sergii Domanskyi, Ali Foroughi pour, Todd B. Sheridan, Steven B. Neuhauser, Alyssa Stetson, Katelyn Dannheim, Danielle B. Cameron, Shawn Ahn, Hao Wu, Emily R. Christison-Lagay, Carol J. Bult, Jeffrey H. Chuang, Jill C. Rubinstein. Multicenter histology image integration and multiscale deep learning for pediatric sarcoma subtype classification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B023.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→French-language works237,207→