MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract IA010: Opportunities and challenges for liquid biopsies in pediatric oncology

2024· article· en· W4402266702 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gudrun Schleiermacher

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLiquid biopsyPediatric oncologyOncologyInternal medicineMedical physicsCancerIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying tumour progression and resistance to treatment is crucial to the development of new treatment approaches. In high risk pediatric cancers, somatic DNA alterations such as genomic amplifications, copy number alterations, translocations or mutations play an important role as molecular diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers. However it is now known that in many high risk pediatric cancers, clonal evolution most likely plays an important role in tumor progression and treatment resistance. Circulating tumour DNA, a fraction of cell free DNA can be readily isolated from plasma and now provides an important tool and surrogate for tumor molecular analyses at diagnosis, during treatment and follow-up. At diagnosis, the prospective clinical trials MICCHADO (NCT03496402) enrolled 599 patients, including high-risk pediatric cancer (Neuroblastoma, Rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, other high-risk cancers). Whole -Exome-Sequencing (WES) was performed on tumor, germline DNA and cfDNA extracted from plasma at diagnosis, during treatment and follow up. Whereas all cfDNA samples obtained at follow-up in patients without evidence of disease revealed no or few tumor cell-specific SNVs, cfDNA samples obtained at relapse harbored additional, new relapse-specific SNVs in all cases, targeting genes of interest. Deep sequencing capture techniques enable to develop models of clonal evolution. In pediatric embryonal brain tumours, ctDNA isolated from CSF enables detection of tumor cell specific genetic alterations with a high sensitivity. At relapse, ctDNA studies can provide complementary information to molecular analyses of tumour samples performed within programs such as MAPPYACTS (NCT02613962), with 76% of actionable alterations detected in tumor also identified in ctDNA, while also highlighting the importance of spatial heterogeneity. MONALISA, a SIOPEN pragmatic clinical trial to MOnitor NeuroblastomA relapse with LIquid biopsy Sensitive Analysis aims to establish liquid biopsies as standard-of-care to monitor relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma. Reliable, early assessment of molecular progression or relapse determined by mRNA and/or ctDNA analysis is the main aim of this randomized clinical trial. ctDNA also enables to infer expression profiles. Gene expression levels are reflected by nucleosome positioning, and differences in nucleosome organization at transcription start sites (TSS) lead to differential clipping of fragments upon ctDNA release and distinct nucleosome footprints depending on the expression of a given gene in the originating cells. Altogether the presence of tumor genetic and epigenetic abnormalities in ctDNA can be documented in most patients with high risk pediatric cancer and frequently suggest spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Sequential studies will further elucidate mechanisms of clonal evolution, tumor progression and therapy resistance. Thus, sequential studies based on liquid biopsies are now integrated into the development and optimization of targeted treatment strategies. Citation Format: Gudrun Schleiermacher. Opportunities and challenges for liquid biopsies in pediatric oncology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr IA010.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→