MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402266791 · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-71843-z

The association of acute and chronic phase cerebrovascular reactivity with patient reported quality of life following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury

2024· article· en· W4402266791 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alwyn Gomez, Izabella Marquez, Logan Froese, Tobias Bergmann, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Nuray Vakitbilir, Abrar Islam, Kevin Y. Stein, Frederick A. Zeiler

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsPan Am ClinicUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthCanada Foundation for InnovationResearch ManitobaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeHealth Sciences Centre Foundation
KeywordsTraumatic brain injuryMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Association (psychology)Emergency medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryPsychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global outcomes have been reported to be associated with cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in the acute phase following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The association of CVR in the acute and chronic phase of injury with patient-reported health-related quality of life metrics (HRQOL) metrics has never been explored. The aim of this study is to examine the association of CVR, as measured by the cerebral oxygen indices (COx and COx_a), in the acute and chronic phase following moderate and severe TBI, with patient reported HRQOL. In this prospective cohort study, performed in a Canadian quaternary care center, the association between continuous acute and chronic phase CVR with patient reported HRQOL outcomes following moderate and severe TBI was examined. The main outcomes of interest of this study were validated measures of patient-reported HRQOL over various domains as measured by both the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and a Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) questionnaire. In the 29 subjects of this cohort, acute phase CVR was found to be significantly more active in those with a favorable Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores of the SF-12 at early follow-up when measured by COx (-0.015 [IQR: -0.067 to 0.032] vs 0.040 [IQR: 0.019 to 0.137] for Favorable first MCS vs Unfavorable respectively; Mann-Whitney U test p-value = 0.046) and COx_a (0.038 [IQR: 0.009 to 0.062] vs 0.112 [IQR: 0.065 to 0.167] for Favorable first MCS vs Unfavorable respectively; Mann-Whitney U test p-value = 0.014). Further, multivariable logistic regression analysis found acute phase COx and COx_a to improve model performance when predicting favorable versus unfavorable early MCS scores over established parameters such as age and measures of injury severity. Associations between outcomes and chronic phase CVR were limited, potentially due to short recording periods. This is the first ever pilot study to identify a relationship between acute phase CVR following moderate-to-severe TBI with mental and cognitive outcomes as experienced by patients. Given the small cohort, these findings will need to be confirmed in a larger multicenter study. This highlights the need for additional examination of the role dysfunctional CVR may play in mental and cognitive outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes more generally following TBI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→