MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A013 Exploring the role of microbiota in cancer development in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome

2024· article· en· W4402266813 on OpenAlexaffabout
Noel WY Ong, Camilla Giovino, Nicholas W. Fischer, Pamela Psarianos, David Malkin

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLi–Fraumeni syndromeCancerMedicineBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineMutationGeneGermline mutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome caused by pathogenic TP53 germline variants and associated with an elevated risk to develop a wide spectrum of malignancies. LFS patients are prone to develop multiple cancers throughout their lifetime, with significantly earlier onset compared to the general population. Currently, there is no cure for LFS; the primary approach to managing LFS is early tumor surveillance to detect tumors in their early state while they are relatively easier to treat. Microbes have been increasingly recognized for their roles in cancer development and progression. Microbes can contribute to cancer risk via the production of DNA-damaging toxins and carcinogenic metabolites which can induce cancer-promoting inflammation. However, the interactions between the microbiome and mutant p53 in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome have not been fully explored. To investigate the contribution of microbes to cancer development in LFS, we depleted the microbiota of Trp53R172H/WT mice (LFS mice; TP53-R175H human homolog) using a wide spectrum of antibiotics. Following 4 days of antibiotic treatment, LFS mice were subcutaneously injected with the MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cell line. Antibiotic treatment was continued until the endpoint of the study. We observed that the antibiotic-treated LFS mice exhibited smaller tumor mass compared to untreated LFS mice, while no antibiotic-associated changes were observed in wildtype littermates. This finding might suggest that the gut microbiome contributes to cancer development in LFS mice. To interrogate whether the gut microbiome of LFS mice promotes tumor development, we conducted faecal filtrate transplant (FFT) from LFS mice—which transfers the microbial metabolites from the faeces in the absence of the microbes themselves—into the wildtype littermates via oral gavage. We observed that the FFT transferred from LFS mice to wildtype littermates was associated with increased tumor growth, which may further support the notion that the gut microbiome in LFS mice promotes tumorigenesis. Microbes can influence tumor development via many different mechanisms, one of which is by inducing cancer-promoting inflammation. The NF-κB pathway plays a central role in inflammation, and it is a crucial component of the immune response to microbial infection. NF-κB signalling is also linked to cancer initiation and progression through the promotion of chronic inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that mutant p53 upregulates the NF-κB pathway in vitro, and is activated in response to microbial infection. Here, we show that NF-κB activity was upregulated in the intestines of LFS mice. Upon FFT-treatment in wildtype p53 mice, the NF-κB activity in the intestine was upregulated. This finding suggests that the gut microbiome in LFS mice promotes inflammation in the intestine, which may further contribute to cancer-causing systemic inflammation. In summary, this work provides insight into the influence of the microbiome on cancer susceptibility in LFS. Citation Format: Noel WY Ong, Camilla M. Giovino, Nicholas W. Fischer, Pamela Psarianos, David Malkin. Exploring the role of microbiota in cancer development in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr A013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→