MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A053 Investigating mechanisms responsible for MAP kinase pathway resistance in RAS-altered neuroblastoma cells

2024· article· en· W4402267017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Subhra Dash, Kerstin Heselmeyer‐Haddad, Stacy Stauffer, Lucas Stauffer, Danny Wangsa, Marielli E. Yohe

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchNeuroblastomaBiologyKinaseCell biologyGeneticsCell culture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common pediatric solid tumor, responsible for about 15% of childhood cancer-related mortality in the United States. Multiple therapies have been established, which include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy and molecularly-targeted therapy, however resistance to these therapies is the major hinderance in curing NB. RAS pathway mutations are prevalent in relapsed NB and are associated with a poorer overall survival. Therefore, comprehending the mechanisms leading to therapy resistance has become an urgent need. In this study, we attempted to identify the resistance mechanism of NB cell lines towards RAS inhibitors. RAS-altered NB cell lines are treated with trametinib, a MAP kinase pathway inhibitor to perform cell viability assays, immunoblotting and RT PCR. Copy number alteration and translocation studies are performed using spectral karyotyping (SKY) and multiplex interphase fluorescent in-situ hybridization (miFISH). We observed that unlike other RAS-altered NB cell lines (SK-N-AS, CHP-212, LA-N-6, SK-N-BE(2)-C), NB-Eb-C1, which harbors a KRAS G12D mutation shows resistance to both MRTX1133 (KRAS G12D direct inhibitor) and trametinib. Immunoblot against crucial genes regulating NB showed high expression of MYCN, the most relevant biomarker of high-risk neuroblastoma. MYCN is unfortunately undruggable hence, standard treatment for MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma patients does not include targeting MYCN itself. We therefore pursued a hypothesis-driven approach towards identifying possible mechanisms responsible for MYCN driven MEKi-resistance in RAS pathway-altered NB cells. MYCN is known to cross talk with the RAS pathway, however this mechanism is not well understood in NB. Therefore, we performed the clonal assessment of NB cell lines using miFISH and to the best of our knowledge are the first to report that, NB-Eb-C1 has a hypertriploid to hypotetraploid baseline with a low copy-number gain of MYCN. To have a profound understanding of the functionality of MYCN in NB, we have taken 3 different NB cell lines with varied MYCN status. CHP-212 (MYCN amplified-extrachromosomal), SK-N-BE(2)-C (MYCN amplified-homogenously staining region), SK-N-AS (MYCN neutral). SKY and FISH revealed that the MYCN copy-number gain in NBEB cells is the result of a translocation between chromosome 2 and 5 involving MYCN. Of note, another frequently abnormally expressed gene in NB, ALK, is co-translocated with MYCN suggesting potential involvement of both genes in imparting chemoresistance. To understand the mechanism of MYCN overexpression in NBEB we will be performing HiC to check for promoter/enhancer hijacking. Also, to better define this translocation and studying other translocations involved we are performing optical genome mapping using BioNano. Other functional experiments will be performed to look at the impact of the RAS/MAPK alteration on MYCN protein stability. We are confident that this study will contribute towards developing new combinations of targeted therapies to improve outcomes in RAS-altered NB. Citation Format: Subhra Dash, Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad, Stacy Stauffer, Lucas Stauffer, Danny Wangsa, Marielli E. Yohe. Investigating mechanisms responsible for MAP kinase pathway resistance in RAS-altered neuroblastoma cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr A053.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207