MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B077: M&M: An RNA-seq based pan-cancer classifier for pediatric tumors

2024· article· en· W4402267052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
F. Wallis, John Baker-Hernandez, Marc van Tuil, Claudia van Hamersveld, Marco J. Koudijs, Eugène T.P. Verwiel, Alex Janse, Laura S. Hiemcke‐Jiwa, Ronald R. de Krijger, Mariëtte E.G. Kranendonk, Marijn A. Vermeulen, Pieter Wesseling, Uta Flucke, Válerie de Haas, Maaike Luesink, Jayne Y. Hehir‐Kwa, Bastiaan B.J. Tops, Patrick Kemmeren, Lennart Kester

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA-SeqPediatric cancerMedicineCancerCancer researchComputational biologyInternal medicineBiologyTranscriptomeGene expressionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With many documented tumor entities, acquiring the correct diagnosis is a challenging but crucial process in pediatric oncology. Notably, rare tumors present a unique challenge given their infrequency and relative unfamiliarity among pathologists. As a result, these tumor entities tend to be affected by higher misclassification rates. Here we present M&M, a pan-cancer ensemble-based machine-learning algorithm specifically tailored towards inclusion of rare pediatric tumor (sub)types. The RNA-seq based algorithm can classify 52 different tumor types, plus the underlying 96 tumor subtypes. Furthermore, M&M encompasses samples from all tumor stages, treatment statuses and from several non-neoplastic tissues. To facilitate infrequently occurring tumor (sub)type classifications, two different classifiers were created and integrated: a Minority classifier tailored towards correct classification of rare tumor (sub)types, and a Majority classifier with more predictive power for high frequency tumor entities. Each classifier was created using the same four steps of feature selection, feature reduction, down-sampling, and classification algorithm selection, using different focusing methods. Classification took place on the tumor subtype level, from which the tumor type could be extrapolated.M&M could correctly classify the tumor type for 94.5% of the samples within the reference cohort, and the underlying tumor subtype for 86.3%. When filtering on high-confidence classifications, M&M could reach a precision of ∼99% for ∼80% of the tumor type, and a precision of ∼96% for 70% of the tumor subtype classifications. For the low-confidence classifications, the correct tumor classification was often included in the three highest-scoring labels, leading to an overall accuracy of 98% within the top 3. For the tumor subtype classifications, this score was 95%. More than two-third of the samples from infrequently occuring tumor types (3-5 samples) received a high-confidence classification, accompanied by a precision of ∼94%. For classes covered within the classifier, M&M’s performance is comparable to existing class-restricted classifiers like the DKFZ methylation classifier for central nervous system tumors. An independent test cohort confirmed the robustness of M&M's performance.Machine-learning algorithms for both adult and childhood cancer are increasingly used in the clinic, contributing towards increased patient survival. However, many tumor entities are currently missing from existing classifiers. Developing and introducing an extensive agnostic pan-cancer classifier in diagnostics has the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy for many pediatric cancer cases, thereby contributing towards optimal patient survival and quality of life. Citation Format: Fleur S.A. Wallis, John L. Baker-Hernandez, Marc van Tuil, Claudia van Hamersveld, Marco J. Koudijs, Eugène T.P. Verwiel, Alex Janse, Laura S. Hiemcke-Jiwa, Ronald R. de Krijger, Mariëtte E.G. Kranendonk, Marijn A. Vermeulen, Pieter Wesseling, Uta E. Flucke, Valérie de Haas, Maaike Luesink, Jayne Y. Hehir-Kwa, Bastiaan B.J. Tops, Patrick Kemmeren, Lennart A. Kester. M&M: An RNA-seq based pan-cancer classifier for pediatric tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B077.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207