MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract IA015: GD2-specific CAR T cell therapies for pediatric solid cancers

2024· article· en· W4402267177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claudia Rössig

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSolid tumorOncologyCancerCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glycolipid GD2 is an attractive immune target in neuroblastoma. Monoclonal antibodies against GD2 are approved agents for the consolidation of remissions but can not eradicate measurable disease. GD2 was the first target for CAR-engineered T cells addressed in a pediatric cancer, with a reassuring safety profile and individual remissions in first-in-human clinical investigation and durable complete responses with advanced CAR designs. However, the activity of GD2 CAR T cell therapy remains limited to proportions of patients with low burden disease. Major hurdles are local barriers in the tumor microenvironment that impede therapeutic immune responses. One potential solution are CAR T cell designs with engineered secretion of activating cytokines that increase numbers of tumor-infiltrating T cells, enhance their potency within an immunosuppressive tumor milieu and activate and/or reprogram bystander cells for a concerted antitumor immune response. Our group has developed a novel investigational medicinal product, GD2-specific autologous CAR T cells with CAR-inducible secretion of cytokine IL-18, a potent danger signal with an important physiological role in antiviral immune defense. This product had superior in vivo antitumor activity compared to a control construct without IL-18 in preclinical work and has now entered clinical investigation in pediatric cancer patients (EU CT 2022-501725-21-00). Besides neuroblastoma, further cancers can express GD2 at antigen densities sufficient to trigger CAR-induced effector cell responses. In the pediatric population, this includes bone sarcomas (Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma) and various CNS cancers such as diffuse midline gliomas and medulloblastoma. To enable selection of patients with adequate GD2 expression for inclusion into GD2 CAR T cell trials, we have established an immunofluorescence-based assay that allows reproducible and robust detection of the glycolipid in paraffine-embedded tissue sections. Moreover, we have found that epigenetic modulation with a clinically approved inhibitor of methyltransferase EZH2 can selectively upregulate GD2 in Ewing sarcoma to high, targetable densities both in vitro and in vivo, potentially extending the applicability of GD2-targeted immunotherapies to patients with initially GD2-negative or low disease. Still, to advance GD2-targeted CAR T cell therapies to their full potential, advanced designs and combination strategies are needed to enable higher and prolonged performance. Early clinical trials with insights into the pre- and posttherapeutic tumor microenvironment will allow to gain knowledge on the biological effects of novel CAR T cell designs to inform future improvements. While the safety and preliminary efficacy of innovative cell-therapeutic agents are being evaluated in early-phase trials, investigators in the well-established international Pediatric Oncology networks must begin to consider academia-driven solutions for the subsequent development and distribution of these complex cell-based therapeutics for the benefit of all patients. Citation Format: Claudia Rossig. GD2-specific CAR T cell therapies for pediatric solid cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr IA015.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→