MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B047: Transcriptional signatures associated with persisting CD19 CAR-T cells in children with leukemia

2024· article· en· W4402267246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathaniel D. Anderson, Jack Birch, Théo Accogli, Ignacio Criado, Eleonora Khabirova, Conor Parks, Yvette Wood, Matthew D. Young, Tarryn Porter, Rachael T. Richardson, Sarah J. Albon, Bilyana Popova, Andre Lopes, Robert Wynn, Rachael Hough, Satyen H. Gohil, Martin Pulé, Persis Amrolia, Sam Behjati, Sara Ghorashian

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukemiaCD19Lymphoblastic LeukemiaCancer researchMedicineBiologyImmunologyAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T-cells have become established as an effective treatment of haematological cancers. In the context of relapsed and refractory childhood pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B ALL), CD19 targeting CAR T-cells often induce durable remissions. One of the most critical determinants of achieving a durable response is the persistence of CAR T-cells. Here, we systematically analysed CD19 CAR T cells of ten children with relapsed or refractory B ALL enrolled in the CARPALL trial (NCT02443831). We performed high throughput single-cell gene expression and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing of infusion products and serial blood and bone marrow samples up to five years post-infusion. We first found that late, long-lived CAR T cells developed a CD4/CD8 double-negative (DN) phenotype characterised by GZMK+ exhausted-like memory state. Our key finding was that the most recurrent and strongest markers of long-lived CAR-T cells generated a persisting CAR T signature that was delineated by the expression of bona fide immune-related genes, such as TIGIT and GPR183, as well as genes with unknown or emerging roles in immune biology. This signature emerged across clonotypes and subsets of T-cells, indicating that CAR T-cells converge transcriptionally when a durable clinical response is achieved. Remarkably, we also detected this persistence signature in recipients of a different CD19 CAR T-cell product that maintained decade long remissions in two adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Examination of single T-cell transcriptomes from a wide range of healthy and diseased tissues across children and adults indicated that the persistence signature is rarely encountered in other settings. Accordingly, we found a persistence signature that appears to be independent of infusion product, patient age, and leukaemia type. These findings raise the possibility that a universal transcriptional signature of clinically effective, persistent CD19 CAR T cells exist. It may provide a basis for the identification of biomarkers of persistence and guide refinement of manufacturing methods. Citation Format: Nathaniel D. Anderson, Jack Birch, Theo Accogli, Ignacio Criado, Eleonora Khabirova, Conor Parks, Yvette Wood, Matthew D. Young, Tarryn Porter, Rachel Richardson, Sarah J. Albon, Bilyana Popova, Andre Lopes, Robert Wynn, Rachael Hough, Satyen H. Gohil, Martin Pule, Persis J. Amrolia, Sam Behjati, Sara Ghorashian. Transcriptional signatures associated with persisting CD19 CAR-T cells in children with leukemia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B047.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→