MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A037 Changes in T-cell repertoire during high-risk neuroblastoma therapy: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group

2024· article· en· W4402267858 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yiyue Jiang, Arash Nabbi, Arnavaz Danesh, Stephanie Pedersen, Jenna Eagles, Arlene Naranjo, Kai Tan, Natalie B. Collins, Steven G. DuBois, Rochelle Bagatell, Brian D. Crompton, Trevor J. Pugh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroblastomaMedicineOncologyInternal medicineRepertoirePediatric oncologyClinical OncologyCancerBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: High-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) carries a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of ∼50% despite intensive treatment. The standard of care (SOC) for HRNB consists of induction chemotherapy, multimodal consolidation therapy, and post-consolidation immunotherapy. While previous research has linked infiltrating T-cells to better prognosis in some pediatric cancers, the importance of the peripheral T-cell repertoire and its T-cell receptors (TCRs) as immune biomarkers for HRNB remains unexplored. Here, we performed a preliminary immunogenomic analysis of a subset of blood samples from the Children’s Oncology Group phase 3 clinical trial NCT03126916, designed to evaluate the effects of adding targeted therapies (including 131I-MIBG) to the SOC on survival and response. Methods: To infer the nucleosome positioning of immune-related sites from coverage information, we generated blood cell-free whole genome sequencing (cfWGS) data for an initial group of 33 patients (N=35 samples). To track the T-cell repertoire, we sequenced TCRs for 12 of the 33 patients from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) (N=14 samples) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (N=26 samples) across diagnosis, mid-induction, and end of post-consolidation. Four patients have samples from all timepoints. We computed peripheral TCR diversity and measured TCR specificity using GLIPHII (Grouping Lymphocyte Interactions by Paratope Hotspots II), against a database of 3681 TCR sequences with empirically defined specificities. We included data from 99 children with non-HRNB cancers and 18 healthy adults as controls. Results: Our diversity analysis found a 4-fold decrease in PBMC TCR diversity from diagnosis (Shannon diversity, mean 619.81) to mid-induction (mean 154.55) and a subsequent increase from mid-induction to post-therapy (mean 557.94; Satterthwaite's mixed-effects model, p=0.003). Our specificity analysis detected 112 TCRs in PBMCs and cfDNA that overlap sequences found in ≥3 relapsed pediatric controls with non-HRNB cancers (per patient mean 3.1; range 0-14). This highlights the possibility to identify relapse-associated antigens for detection of early relapse. Our nucleosome positioning analysis indicated that lymphoid- and myeloid-related genes exhibit reduced accessibility in HRNB at diagnosis compared to healthy adult controls (Welch's t-test, central coverage: p<0.0001). By contrast, MYCN shows higher accessibility, consistent with high expression levels of this oncogene (p<0.0001). The differential accessibility at immune sites compared to oncogenic sites suggests potential mechanisms for immune response alterations. Conclusion: Our initial analysis revealed a mid-chemotherapy decrease in TCR diversity in PBMCs, followed by a partial post-therapy recovery. This shift in diversity was accompanied by the presence of relapse-linked TCRs in some patients but not others, highlighting their potential as emergent immune biomarkers. Additional samples are being analyzed for association with outcomes with standard of care with and without 131I-MIBG. Citation Format: Yiyue Jiang, Arash Nabbi, Arnavaz Danesh, Stephanie Pedersen, Jenna Eagles, Arlene Naranjo, Kai Tan, Natalie Collins, Steven G. DuBois, Rochelle Bagatell, Brian D. Crompton, Trevor J. Pugh. Changes in T-cell repertoire during high-risk neuroblastoma therapy: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr A037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207