MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract B061: Dissecting pediatric sarcoma microenvironment using single-cell and spatial multi-omics

2024· article· en· W4402267877 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhan Zhang, Kyung Jin Ahn, Rumeysa Biyik‐Sit, Changya Chen, Anusha Thadi, Chia‐Hui Chen, William Molina, Brian Lockhart, Theodore W. Laetsch, Lea F. Surrey, Malay Haldar, Kathrin M. Bernt, Vinodh Pillai, Kai Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomaComputational biologyOmicsMedicineTumor microenvironmentCancerBiologyCancer researchBioinformaticsPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Pediatric sarcomas are the second most common solid tumor in children and adolescence. Despite advances in multimodal therapies, one-third of sarcoma patients do not survive the disease. The development of new treatments for sarcomas is hindered by a limited understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME), especially the role of immune cells such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). The abundance of TAMs significantly impacts the clinical outcomes of pediatric sarcoma patients, yet our knowledge of their molecular heterogeneity and interactions with other cell types in the TME remains limited. Methods: To characterize the transcriptomic and epigenomic heterogeneity of sarcoma TME, we profiled 32 treatment-naïve tumor samples from 5 pediatric sarcoma subtypes using the single-nuclei RNA+ATAC-Seq multiome assay. We also interrogated the spatial organization of the sarcoma TME using the multiplexed immunohistochemistry assay, Co-detection by indexing (CODEX), with a focus on the diversity and inter-cellular interactions of TAMs. We utilized in vitro co-culture models of human monocyte-derived macrophages, CD8 T cells and malignant sarcoma cells to validate immunosuppressive signaling interactions between TAMs and CD8 T cells predicted based on our multiome and CODEX data. Results: We sequenced 175,964 and 178,000 high-quality cells from RNA and ATAC modality respectively. Analysis of cell type frequencies across sarcoma subtypes showed that TAMs were the most abundant immune cells in the TME. We identified seven TAM subpopulations with distinct gene expression and epigenomic signatures. Among these, SPP1+ and C1QC+ TAM subsets exhibited higher immunosuppressive potential. By integrating gene expression and chromatin accessibility data, we identified key transcription factors that drive the transcriptional phenotypes of SPP1+/C1QC+ TAMs, including RUNX1 and ELF2. By ligand-receptor analysis using our snRNA-Seq data, we identified signaling ligand-receptor pairs that potentially mediate immunosuppression by SPP1+/C1QC+ TAMs, including SPP1-CD44 and HLA-E-KLRC1. Additionally, interactions like SEMA3D-NRP1 and LTBP3-ITGB5 between malignant cells and SPP1+/C1QC+ TAMs were observed in multiple sarcoma subtypes and significantly associated with inferior prognosis. Furthermore, our CODEX data revealed spatial co-localization between SPP1+TAMs and T cells, further corroborating the immune regulatory role of SPP1+TAMs in the sarcoma TME. Finally, our in vitro experiments revealed that macrophages co-cultured with sarcoma cell lines (RD and RH30) showed increased expression of C1QC/SPP1+ TAM markers, including CD163 and CD109, and demonstrated enhanced immunosuppressive effect on CD8+ T cells. Conclusion: This study presents a comprehensive single-cell multi-omics and spatial omics analysis of the pediatric sarcoma microenvironment. By identifying specific pro-tumorigenic TAM subsets and signaling interactions associated with inferior patient outcome, this study reveals novel insights into the role of TAMs in pediatric sarcomas. Citation Format: Zhan Zhang, Kyung Jin Ahn, Rumeysa Biyik-Sit, Changya Chen, Anusha Thadi, Chia-hui Chen, William Molina, Brian Lockhart, Theodore Laetsch, Lea Surrey, Malay Haldar, Kathrin Bernt, Vinodh Pillai, Kai Tan. Dissecting pediatric sarcoma microenvironment using single-cell and spatial multi-omics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B061.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→