MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A061 Overcoming chemotherapic resistance caused by β3-AR in Ewing’s sarcoma with the receptor’s antagonist

2024· article· en· W4402267948 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Megan Lotti, Rachele Amato, Maria Ascone, Cristina Banella, Francesco Carrozzo, Amada Pasha, Annalisa Tondo, Maura Calvani

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSarcomaAntagonistMedicineReceptor antagonistInternal medicineReceptorPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is a highly malignant tumor that commonly occurs in children and adolescents. The therapeutic strategy is based on a multi-drug chemotherapy regimen, in combination with radiotherapy and surgery. Unfortunately, ES cells exhibit a high sensitivity to rapid changes in intracellular redox environment resulting in an elevated incidence of drug resistance. In recent years, β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) has gained growing attention due to its implication in tumor onset, progression and metastasis, alongside its physiological functions. Indeed, it has been found to be overexpressed in various tumors, especially pediatric malignancies, including ES. β3-adrenergic receptor acts as the main regulator of the cellular response to redox environment, ultimately by influencing the expression of UCP2, well-known transporter that decreases mitochondrial activity and ROS content. The β3-AR antagonist, SR59230A (SR), demonstrated to reverted these effects. Therefore, we exploited the effects of SR59230A in ES cells that increases the intracellular ROS content and enhancing their sensitivity to treatment with doxorubicin (DOX) drug, which among its functions also influences UCP2 protein. As a result, the combination of both compounds may represent a putative novel therapeutic strategy able to overcome drug resistance in ES cancer. Aim: In the attempt of overcoming chemotherapy resistance in Ewing’s sarcoma, we studied the effects of DOX compound in combination with SR, the main β3-AR antagonist, which enhances the cell’s sensitivity to treatments. Methods: We performed proliferation assays to asses IC50 of both compounds in A673 cells. After 3h and 24h of treatment with DOX and SR, alone and in combination, the ROS levels and mitochondrial membrane potential were evaluated using flow cytometry analysis. The metabolic profile of A673 in the same conditions was measured using Seahorse XF Analyzer. The data was confirmed by Western Blotting investigation. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way and two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test (*p<0.05). Results and conclusions: Our data shows an increase in ROS content in A673 cells after 3h and 24h of treatment with DOX and SR in combination compared to treatments with the single drug, in accordance with the modulation of UCP2 exerted by the drugs. This result is confirmed by western blot analysis, which shows an increased level of expression of SOD2 after 24h of treatment with a combination of the compounds. The metabolic real time analysis of A673 after 3h and 24h with the same treatments shows a decreased in ATP mitochondrial production, supporting the flow cytometry investigation that demonstrates a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential after 3h of treatment with both compounds and with SR alone compared to control. In conclusion the β3-AR/UCP2 axis decreased mitochondrial activity by reducing ATP synthesis and mitochondrial ROS content and this effect is reverted by β3-AR antagonist, allowing to overcome drug resistance in combination treatments with DOX. Citation Format: Megan Lotti, Rachele Amato, Maria Ascone, Cristina Banella, Francesco Carrozzo, Amada Pasha, Annalisa Tondo, Maura Calvani. Overcoming chemotherapic resistance caused by β3-AR in Ewing’s sarcoma with the receptor’s antagonist [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr A061.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→