MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B012: Clinical utility of real-time comprehensive molecular profiling in childhood brain tumors

2024· article· en· W4402268363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Loretta M. S. Lau, Dong‐Anh Khuong‐Quang, Jordan Staunton, Nicholas Sanders, Shampavi Sriharan, Sarah Trinder, Neevika Manoharan, Paulette Barahona, Ann-Kristin Alteköester, Kimberley Dias, Megan Rumford, Dianne Sylvester, Jasmine Parhar, Marion K. Mateos, Marie Wong, Chelsea Mayoh, Mark J. Cowley, Paul G. Ekert, Michelle Haber, Vanessa Tyrrell, David S. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfiling (computer programming)MedicineOncologyBioinformaticsComputational biologyBiologyComputer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The ZERO Childhood Cancer Program offers precision medicine for all children with cancer in Australia through the ZERO2 Study. The study has been open at all 9 Australian pediatric oncology centres since October 2023, with the goal to evaluate the clinical utility of real-time comprehensive molecular profiling in different cancer types and risk groups. Methods: The ZERO precision medicine platform includes paired tumor-germline whole genome sequencing, whole transcriptomic sequencing and DNA methylation. Samples are sent for sequencing in parallel with diagnostic work-up and oncologists receive somatic and germline results in real-time. Here we report the clinical utility in the first 181 consecutive CNS tumors. Results: Of the 181 patients with CNS tumor, 80% were enrolled at diagnosis and 20% had relapse/refractory disease. Low-grade glioma was the most frequent (39%), followed by medulloblastoma (15%), ependymoma (11%), high-grade glioma (9%), other CNS embryonal tumors (9%), diffuse midline glioma H3 K27M-altered (DMG) (8%) and other tumor types (9%). Comprehensive molecular profiling provided clinical utility for 161/181 (89%) of CNS tumor patients in 4 categories: diagnosis, molecular classification, therapy, and germline. In 16/181 (9%) patients, results were non-informative due to very low tumor content, none of which were DMG samples. 64 (35%) patients derived clinical benefit from 1 category, 74 (41%) from 2 categories and 23 (13%) from 3 categories. Diagnostic utility in 77 (43%) included confirming histologic diagnosis in 64, solving diagnostic dilemma in 7 (e.g., high-grade glioneuronal tumor to CNS neuroblastoma with FOXR2 activation; embryonal tumor to ETMR without C19MC alteration) and changing diagnosis in 6 (e.g., rhabdomyosarcoma to intracranial DICER1-mutant sarcoma; low-grade to high-grade glioma in Li Fraumeni syndrome). Molecular classification was refined in 82 (45%) including 40 with prognostic significance (e.g., Group 3/4 medulloblastoma subtypes; IDH mutant glioma subtypes). Therapeutic molecular targets were identified in 92 (51%). Of the 62 low-grade gliomas with adequate tumor content, only 30 (48%) had a KIAA1549-BRAF fusion or BRAF V600E mutation. The remaining 32 (52%) included other BRAF fusions, RAF1 fusion, ALK fusion, FGFR1 alterations, IDH1/2 mutation, PDGFRA mutation, and MYB/MYBL1 alterations). 31/181 (17%) patients had reportable germline variants:18 were related to a cancer predisposition syndrome, of which 12 were not previously known. The remaining 13 were secondary findings. Molecular reports were returned at a median of 3.7 weeks from receiving samples, including 13 expedited reports at 3.0 weeks and 25 Group 3/4 medulloblastoma methylation subtype reports at 2.5 weeks. Conclusion: Real-time comprehensive molecular profiling has high clinical utility in childhood brain tumors. Citation Format: Loretta M.S. Lau, Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang, Jordan Staunton, Nicholas Sanders, Shampavi Sriharan, Sarah Trinder, Neevika Manoharan, Paulette Barahona, Ann-Kristin Altekoester, Kimberley Dias, Megan Rumford, Dianne Sylvester, Jasmine Parhar, Marion K. Mateos, Marie Wong, Chelsea Mayoh, Mark J. Cowley, Paul G. Ekert, Michelle Haber, Vanessa Tyrrell, David S Ziegler. Clinical utility of real-time comprehensive molecular profiling in childhood brain tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 5-8; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl):Abstract nr B012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.392 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207