MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402270064 · doi:10.7759/cureus.68722

Sir Harold Ridley as the Pioneer of Intraocular Lenses: His Inspiration Drawn From World War II Pilots

2024· review· en· W4402270064 on OpenAlexaff
Kate S Lim, Anuradha Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraocular Surgery and Lenses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntraocular lensesOptometryWorld War IIOphthalmologyArt historyIntraocular lensArchaeologyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article underscores the monumental contributions of Sir Harold Ridley to the development of intraocular lenses (IOLs), which have revolutionized cataract surgery. Sir Harold Ridley, a British ophthalmologist and medical scientist, drew inspiration from the injuries of World War II pilots to pioneer the first successful IOL implantation in 1949 at St. Thomas's Hospital. The lens, made from Perspex CQ, marked the inception of modern cataract surgery. Despite facing considerable skepticism and resistance from the medical community throughout the 1950s and 60s, Ridley's perseverance led to the gradual acceptance of IOLs by the 1970s. Today, Ridley is rightfully recognized as the "father of the intraocular lens," with his groundbreaking work having profoundly impacted the field of ophthalmology and improved the quality of life for millions globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicIntraocular Surgery and LensesFrench-language works237,207