MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402272996 · doi:10.1364/oe.539459

Focus issue introduction: 3D image acquisition and display: technology, perception and applications

2024· article· en· W4402272996 on OpenAlexaff
Hong Hua, Adrian Stern, Bahram Javidi, Manuel Martı́nez-Corral, Osamu Matobe, Ana Dobla, Simon Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFocus (optics)OpticsComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)PerceptionHolographic displayIntegral imagingComputer visionImage (mathematics)PhysicsHolographyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Feature Issue of Optics Express is organized in conjunction with the 2023 Optica conference on 3D Image Acquisition and Display: Technology, Perception and Applications which was held from 14 to 17 208 of August as part of the 2023 Imaging and Applied Optics Congress in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. This Feature Issue presents 27 articles which cover the topics and scope of the 2023 3D Image Acquisition and Display conference. This Introduction provides a summary of these published articles that appear in this Feature Issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207