Experimental evaluation of electrochemically mediated amine regeneration integrated with amine thermal swing for CO2 capture at optimized desorption temperatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, the integration of electrochemically mediated amine regeneration (EMAR) with amine thermal swing process is investigated as a novel method for CO 2 capture, utilizing experimental practical data. The aim is to increase the absorption-desorption temperature difference in order to improve the energy efficiency of the capture process and hamper the amine degradation issue at high desorption temperatures. A comprehensive experimental procedure is presented, and an experimental process setup is designed and constructed. As the main novelty of the study a special heating-cooling subsystem is incorporated with the base EMAR process in order to devise a combined electrochemical-thermal system. The performance of the system is evaluated at sequential incremental desorption temperatures while the absorption temperature is kept constant. Relevant data, including the desorbed CO 2 flow, absorbed CO 2 flow, stream points temperature, and cell voltage are collected. Based on the data collected, two performance parameters are calculated, including normalized carbon separation work, and CO 2 desorption density. Based on these performance parameters the system's capability is assessed, and the optimal desorption temperature is ultimately selected. The presented electrochemical-thermal CO 2 separation system, operating with a chloride salt system, demonstrates its best energetics performance at a desorption temperature of 44 °C, resulting in a normalized capture work of 95.2 kJ/molCO 2 . Under these optimal conditions, the cell's average voltage is measured to be 0.37 V, and the CO 2 desorption density is determined to be 0.71 l.min −1 .m −2 . • Novel integration of EMAR and thermal swing for energy-efficient CO 2 capture is proposed. • Unique heating-cooling subsystem enhances the electrochemical-thermal system. • Performance evaluated by calculating capture work and CO 2 desorption density. • Optimal desorption at 44°C, achieving work of 95.2 kJ/molCO 2 with 0.37 V voltage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".