Effects of intra-articular versus peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A clinical trial study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of intra-articular and peri-articular dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) without effusion. Patients and methods: Between August 2018 and November 2018, a total of 51 participants including 27 cases (12 males, 15 females; mean age: 55.7±5.2 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group A and 24 cases (9 males, 15 females; mean age: 54.7±4.6 years; range, 38 to 70 years) in Group B were recruited. Group A received intra-articular DPT, while Group B received peri-articular DPT. Treatment was administered two times with two-week intervals. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Scale (OKS) questionnaires were filled at baseline, and four and eight weeks after first injection. Results: At four and eight weeks, the VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline in both groups. There was no significant difference in the WOMAC and OKS scores between two methods. The VAS scores showed superiority of intra-articular method (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both peri-articular and intra-articular DPT were effective in patients with KOA. There was no superiority in terms of functional improvement between two groups. However, intra-articular prolotherapy was more effective in decreasing pain in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".