MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402281157 · doi:10.1656/045.031.s1230

Patterns of Contemporary Genetic Variation and Effective Population Size in Blanding's Turtle Populations

2024· article· en· W4402281157 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Jordan, Brendan N. Reid, Daniel Guinto, Whitney J. B. Anthonysamy, Christina M. Davy, Judith M. Rhymer, Michael Marchand, Matthew D. Cross, Gregory J. Lipps, Yu Man Lee, Bruce A Kingsbury, Lisabeth L. Willey, Michael T. Jones, Jonathan D. Mays, Glenn Johnson, Lori Erb

Bibliographic record

VenueNortheastern Naturalist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurtle Biology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurtle (robot)Variation (astronomy)PopulationBiologyGenetic variationPopulation sizeGeographyDemographyZoologyEcologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adequate genetic variation in a population is fundamental to reducing the risk of inbreeding depression in the short term and maintaining its ability to respond to evolutionary forces over the long term. There are now several studies that use microsatellite loci to assess genetic variation within populations across the geographic range of Emydoidea blandingii (Blanding's Turtle), but direct comparisons among studies have not been conducted. We present estimates of allelic richness (A) and expected heterozygosity (HE) from 59 localities across much of the species'geographic range and compare them using a resampling method that calibrates values relative to a reference population to account for different sample sizes and microsatellite panels. We further compared these measures between 2 datasets, from the midwestern US and from the northeastern US, that were made compatible using a sample of re-genotyped individuals. In both cases, we found lower A and HE in the northeastern localities. We also developed a sensitivity analysis of effective population size (Ne) estimation with the linkage disequilibrium method (NeLD) that used a well-sampled population modelled in the program ‘NeOGen’ to explore the effects of adult population size (Nc), sample size, and locus number while accounting for overlapping generations, life history, and demography. We find that it is possible to estimate Ne with accuracy and precision in populations with Nc < 400 when sample size is ∼25% of adult population size and ≥11 microsatellite loci are used. With this benchmark, we then estimated NeLD in 7 localities using single-sample linkage disequilibrium in NeEstimator, a method that does not account for overlapping generations, demography, and life history but is more accessible for users. This approach overestimated NeLD by ∼37%. Collectively, our analyses of genetic variation within populations facilitate assessment of population status and resiliency in Blanding's Turtles by demonstrating the range of genetic variation across a large number of populations and developing a baseline for the estimation of effective population size in natural populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNortheastern NaturalistSame topicTurtle Biology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207