Denitrification genotypes of endospore-forming <i>Bacillota</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Denitrification is a key metabolic process in the global nitrogen cycle and is performed by taxonomically diverse microorganisms. Despite the widespread importance of this metabolism, challenges remain in identifying denitrifying populations and predicting their metabolic end-products based on their genotype. Here, genome-resolved metagenomics was used to explore the denitrification genotype of Bacillota enriched in nitrate-amended high temperature incubations with confirmed N2O and N2 production. A set of 12 hidden Markov models (HMMs) was created to target the diversity of denitrification genes in members of the phylum Bacillota. Genomic potential for complete denitrification was found in five metagenome-assembled genomes from nitrate-amended enrichments, including two novel members of the Brevibacillaceae family. Genomes of complete denitrifiers encode N2O reductase gene clusters with clade II-type nosZ and often include multiple variants of the nitric oxide reductase gene. The HMM set applied to all genomes of Bacillota from the Genome Taxonomy Database identified 17 genera inferred to contain complete denitrifiers based on their gene content. Among complete denitrifiers it was common for three distinct nitric oxide reductases to be present (qNOR, bNOR, and sNOR) that may reflect the metabolic adaptability of Bacillota in environments with variable redox conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".