Pendampingan Penyusunan Rencana Induk Kawasan Asrama Haji Embarkasi Banjarmasin Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Standar Kawasan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Banjarmasin Embarkation Hajj Dormitory is currently trying to improve its service quality for prospective Hajj pilgrims. At the moment, the area which were built in 1980, no longer meets state building planning standards which might have an impact on decreasing service quality. Outside the Hajj season, the dormitory can also be used by the community, government agencies and socio-religious organizations for activities. This community service activity aims to analyse the suitability of the area as a type E.1 Hajj dormitory area so that it can meet national standards as the basic framework for masterplan through 4 series of group discussion forum. From total of 14 buildings, 4 still meet national standards set by the Indonesian Ministry of Religion, the Director General of Hajj and Umrah. Hence, to revitalize the area, several changes are needed such as developing vehicle and pedestrian circulation routes, building new dormitories, polyclinics, airplane mock-up studios, developing utility networks and clean water , as well as moving the Hajj ritual area. The final evaluation shows results that 4 out of total 14 standards were only maximum 80% developed due to the limited site. However, the master plan reaches 100% for the rest 10 standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".