Pendampingan Penyusunan Rencana Induk Kawasan Asrama Haji Embarkasi Banjarmasin Sebagai Upaya Pemenuhan Standar Kawasan
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Banjarmasin Embarkation Hajj Dormitory is currently trying to improve its service quality for prospective Hajj pilgrims. At the moment, the area which were built in 1980, no longer meets state building planning standards which might have an impact on decreasing service quality. Outside the Hajj season, the dormitory can also be used by the community, government agencies and socio-religious organizations for activities. This community service activity aims to analyse the suitability of the area as a type E.1 Hajj dormitory area so that it can meet national standards as the basic framework for masterplan through 4 series of group discussion forum. From total of 14 buildings, 4 still meet national standards set by the Indonesian Ministry of Religion, the Director General of Hajj and Umrah. Hence, to revitalize the area, several changes are needed such as developing vehicle and pedestrian circulation routes, building new dormitories, polyclinics, airplane mock-up studios, developing utility networks and clean water , as well as moving the Hajj ritual area. The final evaluation shows results that 4 out of total 14 standards were only maximum 80% developed due to the limited site. However, the master plan reaches 100% for the rest 10 standards.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it