MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402284839 · doi:10.36985/0ezr9939

Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat Terhadap Perencanaan Pembangunan Di Kecamatan Siborong - Borong Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara

2023· article· id· W4402284839 on OpenAlex
Tonny Manalu, Robert Tua Siregar, Sarintan E Damanik, Mustafa Ginting

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Regional Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk, mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis proses perencanaan pembangunan di Kecamatan Siborong - borong Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan tujuan utama mendeskripsikan atau melukiskan secara terperinci dan mendalam mengenai partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan di Kecamatan Siborong - borong Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan wawancara semi terstruktur dan observasi. Analisis data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan interactive model analysis dari Miles dan Huberman yang meliputi tahap Reduksi data, penyajian data dan verifikasi data atau penarikan simpulan. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1, Proses perencanaan pembangunan telah dilaksanakan dengan baik di Kecamatan Siborong - borong Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara, dimana : a) beberapa tahapan proses perencanaan pembangunan di masing - masing desa telah dilaksanakan, diantaranya tahapan persiapan dan tahapan pembahasan kegiatan / penetapan prioritas kegiatan yang akan disampaikan ke tingkat musrenbang Kecamatan, seperti Kelurahan Siborong - borong, Desa Pariksabungan, Desa Pohan Julu, Desa Hotabulu, Desa Lobusiregar I dan Desa Desa Lobusiregar II; b) Di tingkat Musrenbang Kecamatan beberapa tahapan proses perencanaan pembangunan telah dilaksanakan, terutama pada tahapan dimana masyarakat telah dilibatkan memutuskan prioritas kegiatan yang akan diajukan ke tingkat Kabupaten. 2. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam perencanaan pembangunan di Kecamatan Siborong-borong Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara masih rendah. Untuk itu perlu penyempurnaam tahapan pelaksanaan perencanaan partisipatif, Mengoptimalkan kegiatan identifikasi masalah dan kebutuhan masyarakat, dan perlu peningkatan pemahaman perangkat desa/kecamatan, unsur pembangunan dan unsur masyarakat mengenai perencanaan pembangunan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it