MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402285129 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad67e1

Gemini Planet Imager Observations of a Resolved Low-inclination Debris Disk around HD 156623

2024· article· en· W4402285129 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Lewis, Michael P. Fitzgerald, Thomas M. Esposito, Pauline Arriaga, Ronald López, Katie A. Crotts, Gaspard Duchêne, Katherine B. Follette, Justin Hom, Paul Kalas, Brenda C. Matthews, Maxwell A. Millar‐Blanchaer, David J. Wilner, Johan Mazoyer, Bruce Macintosh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJet Propulsion LaboratoryNational Astronomical Observatory of JapanAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNational Science FoundationEuropean Space AgencyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónNational Radio Astronomy ObservatoryUniversity of California, Los AngelesNational Institutes of Natural SciencesMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações
KeywordsPhysicsDebris diskPlanetAstrophysicsPlanetary systemRADIUSSpectral energy distributionRadiative transferOrbital inclinationStarsAstronomyLuminosityProtoplanetDebrisBrown dwarfProtoplanetary diskSpectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The 16 Myr old A0V star HD 156623 in the Scorpius–Centaurus association hosts a high-fractional-luminosity debris disk, recently resolved in scattered light for the first time by the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) in polarized intensity only. We present a new analysis of the GPI H-band polarimetric detection of the HD 156623 debris disk, with particular interest in its unique morphology. This debris disk lacks a visible inner clearing, unlike the majority of low-inclination disks in the GPI sample and in Sco-Cen, and it is known to contain CO gas, positioning it as a candidate “hybrid” or “shielded” disk. We use radiative transfer models to constrain the geometric parameters of the disk based on scattered light data and thermal models to constrain the unresolved inner radius based on the system’s spectral energy distribution (SED). We also compute a measurement of the polarized scattering phase function, adding to the existing sample of empirical phase function measurements. We find that HD 156623's debris disk inner radius is constrained to less than 26.6 au from scattered light imagery and less than 13.4 au from SED modeling at a 99.7% confidence interval and suggest that gas drag may play a role in retaining sub-blowout-size dust grains so close to the star.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207